Does Anger Justify
Condemnation
When does rage
over failure to get our own way make it right to visit criticism, condemnation,
and harm to the one who doesn’t march to our tune?
Dick B.
Copyright 2012 Anonymous.
All rights reserved
What’s
this got to do with A.A.?
I’ll
never forget the AA who said he went to A.A. meetings to find someone to hate.
Nor the many times some writer about A.A., who dislikes another writer or his
viewpoint, vented his steam and condemnation on the other whom he deems
unworthy of respect and attention? Nor the many times some angry and
pontificating Christian, who thinks A.A. is wrong and that other Christians who
go there are hell bound, arms his language with Scriptural error and senses
knowledge hogwash into trying to suppress a child of God dedicated to helping
still suffering drunks in the fellowship? Nor those AAs who just can’t keep
quiet and are bent on airing their angry venom with words that they believe will
somehow control those suffering souls who mention their belief in God, their
love of the Lord, and their use of the Bible.
The
resentful behavior and retaliation are, of course, not a creature or creation
of Alcoholics Anonymous. They can be found in all walks of life. But they do
great harm to the service to God and those about us who consider it a duty and
a necessity to reach out to the faltering hands of a desperate drunk..
Hatred,
condemnation, and vengeance do not square with A.A. principles and practices at
their best. And if a bunch of drunks can agree that circles of love trump
circles of wrath, there’s no good reason why some of the afflicted should toss
out the compelling A.A. ideas that they, the intolerant, are not God. Or that
they may not put a fence around the world and keep other drunks in line.
A.A.’s
Big Book has some useful guides: (1) “Selfishness—self-centeredness. That, we
think is the root of our troubles” (p. 62). (2) “We asked ourselves why we were
angry. In most cases it was found that our self-esteem, our pocketbooks, our
ambitions, our personal relationships (including sex) were hurt or threatened.
So we were sore. We were ‘burned up’” (pp. 64-65). (3) “But the more we fought
and tried to have our own way, the worse matters got. . . . If we were to live,
we had to be free of anger. The grouch and the brainstorm were not for us.” (p.
66). (4) “God save me from being angry. . . . We avoid retaliation or argument”
(p. 67).
True
or untrustworthy, these principles do arrest the attention of the sick drunk
who enters A.A. and decides he has to find and adopt a new way of living.
Put
this in biblical terms: (1) Ephesians 4:26: “Be ye angry; and sin not; let not
the sun go down upon your wrath.” (2) Ephesians 4:31: “Let all bitterness, and
wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with
all malice.” (3) Ephesians 4:32 “And be ye kind to one to another . . .” (4)
Ephesians 5:2: “And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us. . . “
If
you compare the words of Dr. Bob and his wife Anne and some of the language of
the Big Book with the words of the Bible, it is not hard to see why Dr. Bob
said the basic ideas for the Steps themselves came from the study and effort in
the Bible that went on in early A.A. from 1935-1938.
A.A.
is not perfect. It’s not monolithic. It does not exist to be judged by some
unbalanced critic. It harbors people with all kinds of difficulties,
addictions, shortcomings, beliefs, and behavioral attitudes. But its principles
that challenge the newcomer and old-timer alike to put off the old man and put
on the new provide an applicable challenge for raging protesters. The angry
writer, the angry Christian, the angry AA, and the bleeding deacon who wants to
control others have ample reason to change their own approaches and actions.
Whether they read the Big Book, study the Bible, or come to realize how much
harm comes from unrestrained harms done.
Gloria Deo
No comments:
Post a Comment